thoughts on fakes of young starlets

[Mr. Roboto]

I have to agree with Demogorgon here as well. I don't like to stray into the underage area myself for personal tastes, but anyone who knows my fakes knows that my personal tastes in fakes probably have their own whole different moral discussion for another time.
As far as I'm concerened, if the source material used for the fakes didn't come from anything that did harm to the person, and was simply altered through creative use of software, then it's purely a work of fiction.

Out of curiousity I would like to know how other fakers feel about my work, and if it is crossing a moral line or not.

KK here is a rare animal in the sense that his fakes are quite controversial and cross many lines, and it doesn't diminish the fact that it's great artwork that deserves praise and appreciation - he has a lot of "followers" or "fans" or whatever our audience is called. He's a great artist that knows his craft very well (I would like to learn a couple of things from him) and uses it to create his fantasies. Morality should not enter the equation here, but acceptance of other ppl deviances. I mean, just read loudly and slowly the name of this forum.

I personally don't like anything that even suggest harming or causing pain (mental or physical) so you will never see bdsm or rape fantasies or anything like that in my work, but that's just me; I've told him that I prefer his running mascara and whore make ups, which are AMAZING and he even made one for me when I asked - cool guy

Some ppl like futa, or foor fetish, or scat, or fucking a warm apple pie, and some others do not even like to watch at nudity but love lingerie and gravure. So, to each his own

My point is: we must do what we like, what turns us on, and try to create our darkest fantasies - but don't harm others in the process (like using actual CP for a fake)

[kk1039]

Thanks Roboto, I kind of always struggled to find a place to post and share my fakes but I’m glad people on this and the old site enjoy them. I was thinking of putting together a kind of photoshop tutorial mega thread starting with the basics and going on to more advanced techniques for people who want to get into making fakes, headshots and decent source material first for example, but not quite sure which section of the site to put it under. There are a lot of amazing fakers on here so I think it’s a great place to put something like that so others could contribute as well.

[HEBERT 3.0]

I have to agree with Demogorgon here as well. I don't like to stray into the underage area myself for personal tastes, but anyone who knows my fakes knows that my personal tastes in fakes probably have their own whole different moral discussion for another time.
As far as I'm concerened, if the source material used for the fakes didn't come from anything that did harm to the person, and was simply altered through creative use of software, then it's purely a work of fiction.

Out of curiousity I would like to know how other fakers feel about my work, and if it is crossing a moral line or not.

KK here is a rare animal in the sense that his fakes are quite controversial and cross many lines, and it doesn't diminish the fact that it's great artwork that deserves praise and appreciation - he has a lot of "followers" or "fans" or whatever our audience is called. He's a great artist that knows his craft very well (I would like to learn a couple of things from him) and uses it to create his fantasies. Morality should not enter the equation here, but acceptance of other ppl deviances. I mean, just read loudly and slowly the name of this forum.

I personally don't like anything that even suggest harming or causing pain (mental or physical) so you will never see bdsm or rape fantasies or anything like that in my work, but that's just me; I've told him that I prefer his running mascara and whore make ups, which are AMAZING and he even made one for me when I asked - cool guy

Some ppl like futa, or foor fetish, or scat, or fucking a warm apple pie, and some others do not even like to watch at nudity but love lingerie and gravure. So, to each his own

My point is: we must do what we like, what turns us on, and try to create our darkest fantasies - but don't harm others in the process (like using actual CP for a fake)

II'm enjoying these essays here, what a bunch of geeks and nerds lol, JK, please keep it on

[HEBERT 3.0]

Thanks Roboto, I kind of always struggled to find a place to post and share my fakes but I’m glad people on this and the old site enjoy them. I was thinking of putting together a kind of photoshop tutorial mega thread starting with the basics and going on to more advanced techniques for people who want to get into making fakes, headshots and decent source material first for example, but not quite sure which section of the site to put it under. There are a lot of amazing fakers on here so I think it’s a great place to put something like that so others could contribute as well.

I tried to fake in the past and it is like drawing or any other artistic endeavour (I can also be geeky bitches), I guess the more you try it the better you get at it, but definitely you need at least a bit of talent to start with. I like hyper realistic fakes, so is discouraging to spend many hours and the result is a poorly done fake that doesn't reflect what I have in my mind. Long story short, I suck at it and seeing masterpieces by Griever or Vargas or Nakedlodeon or Roboto or FrostedFakes is encouraging and frustrating at the same time. I know for sure that most fakirs started faking because they wanted to see and to fap, I bet, to a particular girl put in sexy situations by the magic of photoshop or gimp or whatever, but I've been extremely lucky and when I develop a crush on a starlet I've managed to get great fakirs on board, so I eventually see my princesses performing my fantasies so the incentive of scarcity doesn't work for me.

I guess a different thread for tutorials and discussion about the art of faking will be interesting, great idea KK

[kc221296]

In my own view, I would say I try to avoid UA to prevent problems like the older site. This is what I picture: when someone does a Google search and finds fake nudes of a legal celeb (let's say for example Jennifer Lawrence), they won't mention a thing. However, when you look up the old .com site you find tons of UA images, which instantly implies that the site is a site for UA porn. I enjoy the site as a means of living out my fantasies or helping others live out theirs, but when a site touches on controversial topics like UA, won't it cause a stir on the Internet and eventually cause the site to be taken down, just like .com? I don't know how it works to be honest, but this was just basically my guess of what happened to it.

On the subject of fakes and fantasies though, like I've mentioned, I don't do UA fakes but I have had people thinking some of my fakes are UA due to how I tend to do amateur Asian fakes, and how petite Asian bodies look a lot younger than western women. In the end, I still think it's a means of living out a fantasy (like if someone really liked a girl and always fantasized about the girl sending them a nude). I personally choose to avoid it, in fear of possibly indirectly getting the site pulled down just like .com, but in the end I guess it's still up to your personal taste. kk1039 does awesome fakes, as pointed out, and I really respect his skills, but it does go into some very controversial territories. But yet, it doesn't go that deep into "guro" territory, so I feel it's still considerably "safe". However, back on the main topic about young celebrities, I would still feel it's safer for this site that we don't post them if they're child celebrities (Millie Bobby Brown, Dafne Keen, just to name a few). They may end up being dug up on Google images reported for being CP.

[HEBERT 3.0]

In my own view, I would say I try to avoid UA to prevent problems like the older site. This is what I picture: when someone does a Google search and finds fake nudes of a legal celeb (let's say for example Jennifer Lawrence), they won't mention a thing. However, when you look up the old .com site you find tons of UA images, which instantly implies that the site is a site for UA porn. I enjoy the site as a means of living out my fantasies or helping others live out theirs, but when a site touches on controversial topics like UA, won't it cause a stir on the Internet and eventually cause the site to be taken down, just like .com? I don't know how it works to be honest, but this was just basically my guess of what happened to it.

On the subject of fakes and fantasies though, like I've mentioned, I don't do UA fakes but I have had people thinking some of my fakes are UA due to how I tend to do amateur Asian fakes, and how petite Asian bodies look a lot younger than western women. In the end, I still think it's a means of living out a fantasy (like if someone really liked a girl and always fantasized about the girl sending them a nude). I personally choose to avoid it, in fear of possibly indirectly getting the site pulled down just like .com, but in the end I guess it's still up to your personal taste. kk1039 does awesome fakes, as pointed out, and I really respect his skills, but it does go into some very controversial territories. But yet, it doesn't go that deep into "guro" territory, so I feel it's still considerably "safe". However, back on the main topic about young celebrities, I would still feel it's safer for this site that we don't post them if they're child celebrities (Millie Bobby Brown, Dafne Keen, just to name a few). They may end up being dug up on Google images reported for being CP.

I love young starlet fakes but your points are valid - regardless of the mental gymnastics we do a fake of a ua celeb will still be considered inappropriate and illegal by the mainstream, and there will be repercussions if you post or create that content. But remember, being illegal doesn't mean is wrong. Funny to find moral police here, a lot of hysteria for a young celeb faked, but is ok to "get back" at "your ugly teacher" by requesting and paying and being paid for fakes.

Also i had to look up "guro" and now my day has been ruined, thanks

[Mr. Roboto]

I don't have a problem if the actress has hit puberty and is developing breasts, etc as long as legal body shots are used.

This is an interesting point - what mrbowhunr mentions usually happens around 13 or 14

Have you seen pics of Kim Kardashian at that age?




Daniell Bregoli?




Francesca Capaldi?




I know that admins here are more strict, and that Francesca's thread have been deleted several times and that's fine, is their forum and I respect their decisions. I'm only saying that hotness doesn't start automatically at 18.

[Kinky93]

Francesca is the only ua celebrity that I find very attractive. Maybe it's that fiery red hair and those long sexy legs and feet

[magpie]

I think this website will be more permissive with such fakes: http://freshmodels.eu/

[HEBERT 3.0]

I think this website will be more permissive with such fakes: http://freshmodels.eu/

just joined and looks good! thanks for the tip dude, gonna tell the squad!

[magpie]

I think this website will be more permissive with such fakes: http://freshmodels.eu/

just joined and looks good! thanks for the tip dude, gonna tell the squad!

You are welcome, if one day you are up for a chat feel free to drop me a message

[YoOoster]

I think this website will be more permissive with such fakes: http://freshmodels.eu/

Ah, this is why the website suddenly has a stream of new members.

[Wascally Wemix]

she is 11 years old ..dafuckk dude????


https://www.instagram.com/malutrevejo/

[Otwo2]

she is 11 years old ..dafuckk dude????


https://www.instagram.com/malutrevejo/

I've seen that girl before. she puts beer on her body to get a better tan xD

[HEBERT 3.0]

I think this website will be more permissive with such fakes: http://freshmodels.eu/

Ah, this is why the website suddenly has a stream of new members.

Hope you don't mind! here are a bit closeminded with fakes, but most of those guys like to cum on lil girls panties or on their pics